Sign in

close

Registering for this site allows you to access your order status and history. Just fill in the fields below, and we’ll get a new account set up for you in no time. We will only ask you for information necessary to make the purchase process faster and easier.

Create an Account

Shopping cart

close
  • No products in the cart.

Allograft Solutions for Every Indication

DynaBlast®

Demineralized Bone Matrix with Cancellous Bone

  • Mineralized cancellous bone chips with Demineralized Bone Matrix in Reverse Phase Medium
  • Powerful 2-in-1 combination of osteoconductive and osteoinductive elements in a carrier that thickens at body temperature and resists irrigation
  • Available in paste and putty formulations

Accell Connexus®

Demineralized Bone Matrix

  • Advanced bone grafting, built on a strong foundation
  • Combines Demineralized Bone Matrix and Reverse Phase Medium with Accell Technology to create Accell Bone Matrix
  • Patented dispersed form of Demineralized Bone Matrix that offers a significant increase in surface area, which provides access to natural bone proteins delivering osteoinductive properties 

DynaGraft-D®

Osteoinductive Bone Graft Substitute

  • Combination of Demineralized Bone Matrix and Reverse Phase Medium providing osteoinductive properties with excellent handling for stimulating bone growth
  • Can be used alone or as a bone graft extender
  • Available in gel and putty formulations

DynaCore®

Mineralized Allograft Particulate

  • Available in mineralized cortical, cancellous, and 80:20 cortical/cancellous mix formulations
  • Packs well into any shape defect for surgical flexibility
  • Rehydrates for use alone or as a bone graft extender
  • Scaffold maintains space and volume of the defect site
  • Provides an osteoconductive scaffold to encourage the attachment of osteogenic precursor cells
  • Gradual resorption and replacement with the patient’s own bone
  • Conveniently stored at ambient temperature 

DynaMatrix® and DynaMatrix® Plus

Extracellular Membrane

  • Intact, naturally occurring Extracellular Matrix designed to remodel soft tissue
  • Flexible enough to be rolled or folded, yet strong enough to be sutured or tacked
  • Easily cut when dry, but will not tear when wet
  • Choice of thickness; DynaMatrix® Plus is twice the thickness of standard DynaMatrix®
  • Naturally bioactive membrane

Featured Products

Magnetic Mallet

W&H Implantmed

Questions?

We want to hear from you.

Name:

Phone:

Zip Code:

Email:

Preferred Contact Method:

Message:

References

1. Lazzara RJ. Immediate implant placement into extraction sites: Surgical and restorative advantages. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1989;9:332–343.2. Schwartz-Arad D, Chaushu G. The ways and wherefores of immedi-ate placement of implants into fresh extraction sites: A literature review. J Periodontol 1997;68:915–932.3. Becker W, Becker B. Replacement of maxillary and mandibular mo-lars with single endosseous implant restorations: A retrospective study. J Prosthet Dent 1995;74:51–55.4. Schwartz-Arad D, Grossman Y, Chaushu G. The clinical effectiveness of implants placed immediately into fresh extraction sites of molar teeth. J Periodontol 2000;71:839–844. 5. Atieh MA, Payne AG, Duncan WJ, de Silva RK, Cullinan MP.. Immedi-ate placement or immediate restoration/loading of single implants for molar tooth replacement: A systematic review and meta-analy-sis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010;25:401–415.6. Fugazzatto P. Implant placement at the time of maxillary molar extraction: Treatment protocols and report of results. J Periodontol 2008;79:216–223.7. Fugazzatto P. Implant placement at the time of mandibular molar extraction: Description of technique and preliminary results of 341 cases. J Periodontol 2008;79:737–747.8. Cafiero C, Annibali S, Gherlone E, et al, ITI Study Group Italia. Im-mediate transmucosal implant placement in molar extraction sites: A 12-month prospective multicenter cohort study. Clin Oral Im-plants Res 2008;19:476–482.9. Block MS. Placement of implants into fresh molar sites: Results of 35 cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011;69:170–174.10. Wood DL, Hoag PM, Donnenfeld OW, Rosenfeld LD. Alveolar crest reduction following full and partial thickness flaps. J Periodontol 1972;43:141–144.11. Kerns DG, Greenwell H, Wittwer JW, Drisko C, Williams JN, Kerns LL. Root trunk dimensions of 5 different tooth types. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1999;19:82–91.12. Scheid RC, Weiss G. Woelfel’s Dental Anatomy, ed 8. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2012:161–162.13. Walker L, Morris G, Novotny PJ. Implant Insertional torque values predict outcomes. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011;69:1344–1349.14. Artzi Z, Parson A, Nemcovsky CE. Wide-diameter implant place-ment and internal sinus membrane elevation in the immediate postextraction phase: Clinical and radiographic observations in 12 consecutive molar sites. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;18: 242–249.15. Akimoto K, Becker W. Evaluation of titanium implants placed into simulated extraction sockets: A study in dogs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14:351–360.16. Wilson T, Schenk R, Buser D, et al. Implants placed in immediate extraction sites: A report of histologic and histometric analysis of human biopsies. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998;13:333–341. Wohrle P. Single tooth replacement in the aesthetic zone with immediate provisionalization: 14 consecutive cases. Pract Periodon-tics Aesthet Dent 1998;10:1107–1114Smith RB, Tarnow DP, Brown M, Chu S, Zamzok J. Placement of im-mediate implants and a fixed provisional restoration to replace the four mandibular incisors: Report of 10 consecutive cases followed for 1–6 years. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2009;30:408–416. 19. Tarnow D, Chu S. Human histologic verification of osseointegra-tion of an immediate implant placed into a fresh extraction socket with excessive gap distance without primary flap closure, graft,or membrane: A case report. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2011;31:515–521.20. Araujo M, Linder E, Lindhe J. Bio-Oss Collagen in the buccal gap at immediate implants: A 6-month study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011;22:1–8.21. Braut V, Bornstein M, Lauber R, Buser D. Bone dimensions in the posterior mandible: A retrospective radiographic study using cone beam computed tomography. Part 1—Analysis of dentate sites. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2012;32:175–184.

Scroll To TopScroll To Top