Dynamic Conical Implant MC
22° Conical Connection
Secure Implant Abutment Interface
Tightly sealed conical interface with a deep internal hex connection offers high mechanical strength and platform switching to optimize bone preservation and soft tissue.11,12,13
One Platform
Simplified Workflow
One platform across all implant diameters simplifies the restorative workflow, with one prosthetic connection providing a variety of restorative options. This drives efficiency and reduces treatment complexity.
Precision Milled
Implant and abutments are produced to an accuracy within 0.5° to achieve excellent retention. The tighter the tolerance, the greater the mechanical retention for eliminating micromovement and providing a clinical seal between the implant and the abutment.11,12,13
The proprietary K-LEAN™ surface is created by two sequential stages: sandblasting, aimed at creating a porous surface topography, followed by acid etching, intended to generate micro-roughened surface structure. The surface treatment is completed by removing contaminants using ultra-pure water (UPW), a unique process acquired from the semiconductor industry.8,9,10
“PALTOP has decided to consistently clean their products with ultra-pure water (UPW), which is rather expensive to produce, compared to regular demineralized water, and is otherwise mostly employed by the semiconductor industry.”9
References
AI-Nsour MM, Hsun-Liang C, Wang HL.Effect of the Platform-Switching Technique on Preservation of Peri-implant Marginal Bone: A Systematic Review. The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants Volume 27, Number 1, 2012.
Cappiello M, Luongo R, Di Iorio D, Bugea C, Cocchetto R, Celletti R. Evaluation of peri-implant bone loss around platform-switched implants. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2008 Aug;28(4):347-55.
Prosper L, Redaelli S, Pasi M, Zarone F, Radaelli G, Gherlone EF. A randomized prospective multicenter trial evaluating the platform-switching technique for the prevention of post-restorative crestal bone loss. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009 Mar-Apr;24(2):299-308.
M. Schmitt C, Nogueira Filho G, C. Tenenbaum H, Yuan Lai J, Brito C, Döring H, Nonhoff J. Performance of conical abutment (morse Taper) connection implants: A Systematic review. J Biomed Mater Res Part A: 102A: 552–574, 2014.
Sang-Woon L, Min-Sang C, Ji-Hye L, Lee-Ra C, Chan-Jin P. Joint stability of internal conical connection abutments with or without hexagon indexes: an in vitro study. Journal of Dental Rehabilitation and Applied Science, 10.14368/jdras.2020.36.2.95, 36, 2, 95-103, 2020.
Tsuruta K, Ayukawa Y, Matsuzaki T, Kihara M, Koyano K. The influence of implant-abutment connection on the screw loosening and microleakage. Int. J. Implant Dent. 2018, 4, 1–6.
Klein M, Tarnow D, Lehrfield L. Marginal Bone Changes on Ultraclean, Micro-Threaded Platform-Switched Implants Following Restoration: 1- to 4-Year Data. Compendium of Continuin Education in Dentistry. Article Vol. 41 No. 4. 2020.
Singh Dhaliwal J, Rani Nakka David S, Ramizah Zulhilmi N, Kaur Sodhi Dhaliwal S, Knights J, Ferreira de Albuquerque Junior R. Contamination of titanium dental implants: a narrative review. SN Applied Sciences volume 2, Article number: 1011. 2020.
Duddeck D, Maghaireh H, Faber FJ and Neugebauser J. SEM surface analyses of 120 sterile-packed implants. EDI Journal. 2014; 64-75.
